subject
Business, 05.05.2020 03:58 anna4060

This question asks you to reconsider the when-to-cut-a-tree problem (from Question 3 on Problem Set #4). Once again, suppose that Mr. X has a tree growing in his yard that has become too large, and he must cut it down within the next four years. Cutting down the tree requires effort, and he would like to wait and cut down the tree later. However, each year that he delays, the tree geta bigger and requires even more effort to cut down. Specifically, suppose that the effort cost to cut down the tree in year 7 is c(), where c(1) = 24, (2) = 29, c(3) = 36, and c(4) = 48. Suppose that Mr. X has present bias with 3 = .8 and = .9, and that the only utility consequence of cutting down the tree is the disutility of effort experienced when the tree is cut.

(a) From a year.1 perspective, what are Mr. X's preferences over the four possible cutting dates?

(b) If Mr. X does not cut the tree in year 1, then, from a year-2 perspective, what are his preferences over the three remaining possible cutting dates?

(c) If Mr. X does not cut the tree in years 1 or 2, then, from a year-3 perspective, what are his preferences over the two remaining possible cutting dates?

(d) If Mr. X is naive, when will he cut the tree? () If Mr. X is sophisticated, when will he cut the tree?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Which two of the following are benefits of consumer programs
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:30
Upper a report about the decline of western investment in third world countries included this: "after years of daily flights comma several european airlines halted passenger service. foreign investment fell 400 percent during the 1990 s." what is wrong with this statement? choose the correct answer below. a. if foreign investment fell by 100 % comma it would be totally eliminated comma so it is not possible for it to fall by more than 100 %. b. the actual amount of the decrease in foreign investment is less than 100%. c. if foreign investment fell by 100%, it would be cut in half. thus, a decrease of 200% means that it would be totally eliminated, and a decrease of more than 200% is impossible. d. the statement does not mention the initial amount of foreign investment.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:20
Firms like papa john’s, domino’s, and pizza hut sell pizza and other products that are differentiated in nature. while numerous pizza chains exist in most locations, the differentiated nature of these firms’ products permits them to charge prices above marginal cost. given these observations, is the pizza industry most likely a monopoly, perfectly competitive, monopolistically competitive, or an oligopoly industry?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:30
Shelly bought a house five years ago for $150,000 and obtained an 80% loan. now the home is worth $140,000 and her loan balance has been reduced by $12,000. what is shelly's current equity?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
This question asks you to reconsider the when-to-cut-a-tree problem (from Question 3 on Problem Set...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 31.03.2021 23:50
question
English, 31.03.2021 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722361