In Lieberman v. Wyoming, LLC, Lieberman dissociated from the LLC and demanded cash for his share of the company. The remaining members voted to continue the company, and the operating agreement discussed distribution in the case of dissolution but not simple dissociation. The court decided that:

A. Lieberman had rightfully dissociated from the company but since the operating agreement was silent as to distribution should the company continue, he forfeited all rights upon dissociation and should receive nothing
B. because the operating agreement was silent on the issue, the Uniform Limited Liability Company Act controlled and Lieberman should get his initial investment back but nothing above that
C. fundamental common law rules of fairness should apply and Lieberman was due a fair share to be decided by independent business analysts
D. Lieberman had rightfully dissociated from the company but since the operating agreement was silent as to distribution and state LLC law was also silent regarding the issue, Lieberman should get no distribution for dissociation but would retain his interest in the company until dissolution occurs.

Plz i have no idea what a cover letter is can u guys explain it to me write a letter to the address below. you are responding to an advertisement from the willamette company for a job opening as an office assistant. you did some research and learned that the person to whom the application should be sent is ms. katrina n. d. waives. you are going to enclose a résumé and three letters of reference. your résumé will have details about your qualifications, so you should just give a brief but inviting overview of them here. in addition, your letter will include a very important paragraph that is not normally a part of a business letter. you will tell what format you are using for your letter where you got the information on this format. address of the willamette company: 355 buck hill road, portland, oregon 48792.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

conquest, inc. produces a special kind of light-weight, recreational vehicle that has a unique design. it allows the company to follow a cost-plus pricing strategy. it has $9,000,000 of average assets, and the desired profit is a 10% return on assets. assume all products produced are sold. additional data are as follows: sales volume 1000 units per year; variable costs $1000 per unit; fixed costs $4,000,000 per year; using the cost-plus pricing approach, what should be the sales price per unit?