subject
Business, 24.04.2020 19:51 jordanbb9482

Winslow Inc. manufactures and sells three types of shoes. The income statements prepared under the absorption costing method for the three shoes are as follows: Winslow Inc. Product Income Statements—Absorption Costing For the Year Ended December 31, 20Y1 Cross Training Shoes Golf Shoes Running Shoes Revenues $5,800,000 $6,900,000 $4,200,000 Cost of goods sold (3,016,000) (3,381,000) (2,814,000) Gross profit $2,784,000 $3,519,000 $1,386,000 Selling and administrative expenses (2,436,000) (2,484,000) (2,142,000) Operating income $348,000 $1,035,000 $(756,000) In addition, you have determined the following information with respect to allocated fixed costs: Cross Training Shoes Golf Shoes Running Shoes Fixed costs: Cost of goods sold $928,000 $897,000 $798,000 Selling and administrative expenses 696,000 828,000 588,000 These fixed costs are used to support all three product lines and will not change with the elimination of any one product. In addition, you have determined that the effects of inventory may be ignored. The management of the company has deemed the profit performance of the running shoe line as unacceptable. As a result, it has decided to eliminate the running shoe line. Management does not expect to be able to increase sales in the other two lines. However, as a result of eliminating the running shoe line, management expects the profits of the company to increase by $756,000. a. Are management’s decision and conclusions correct?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 00:30
How did lani lazzari show her investors she was a good investment? (site 1)
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:00
Apopular low-cost airline, parson corp., has gone out of business. although the service and price provided by the airline was what customers wanted, the larger airlines were able to drive the low-cost airline out of business through an aggressive price war. which component of the competitive environment does this illustrate? a) threat of new entrants b)competitors c) economic factors d) customers d) regulators
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20
Why is it easier for new entrants to get involved in radical innovations when compared to incumbent firms? a. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have to face the high entry barriers, initially. b. new entrants are embedded in an innovation ecosystem, while incumbent firms are not. c. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have formal organizational structures and processes. d. incumbent firms do not have the advantages of network effects that new entrants have.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 08:00
Whom do progressive taxes assess? a. only a large percentage of high-income households b. only a large percentage of organizations c. a large percentage of high-income households and organizations d. a large percentage of low-income households e. a small percentage of high-income households
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Winslow Inc. manufactures and sells three types of shoes. The income statements prepared under the a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.07.2019 16:30
question
Chemistry, 11.07.2019 16:30
Questions on the website: 13722360