Business, 23.04.2020 17:10 catelinboog04

In the Smith v. Riley case referenced in the textbook, how did the Tennessee Court of Appeals rule regarding whether a purchase for "the sum of One Dollar ($1.00)and other good and valuable consideration" was sufficient consideration to support an agreement?

A)The Court ruled that the purchase amount was sufficient consideration.

B)The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because the sale of an interest in a lease was involved.

C)The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because a sale of goods was involved.

D)The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration, but only because a domestic partnership was involved.

E)The Court ruled that the purchase amount was insufficient consideration because over $50,000 was at issue.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 10:50

Choose the statement that is incorrect. a. search activity occurs only in markets where there is a shortage. b. when a price is regulated and there is a shortage, search activity increases. c. the time spent looking for someone with whom to do business is called search activity. d. the opportunity cost of a good is equal to its price plus the value of the search time spent finding the good.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 12:50

You own 2,200 shares of deltona hardware. the company has stated that it plans on issuing a dividend of $0.42 a share at the end of this year and then issuing a final liquidating dividend of $2.90 a share at the end of next year. your required rate of return on this security is 16 percent. ignoring taxes, what is the value of one share of this stock to you today?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 17:10

To : of $25 up to 35 2 35 up to 45 5 45 up to 55 7 55 up to 65 20 65 up to 75 16 is$25 up to $35 ?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:20

Gamegirl inc., has the following transactions during august. august 6 sold 76 handheld game devices for $230 each to ds unlimited on account, terms 2/10, net 60. the cost of the 76 game devices sold, was $210 each. august 10 ds unlimited returned six game devices purchased on 6th august since they were defective. august 14 received full amount due from ds unlimited. required: prepare the transactions for gamegirl, inc., assuming the company uses a perpetual inventory syste

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

In the Smith v. Riley case referenced in the textbook, how did the Tennessee Court of Appeals rule r...

Questions