4 Sold $600 of merchandise on credit (that had cost $240) to Natara Morris, terms n/15. 5 Sold $8,200 of merchandise (that had cost $3,280) to customers who used their Zisa cards. Zisa charges a 6.0% fee. 6 Sold $6,110 of merchandise (that had cost $2,444) to customers who used their Access cards. Access charges a 5.0% fee. 8 Sold $4,400 of merchandise (that had cost $1,760) to customers who used their Access cards. Access charges a 5.0% fee. 13 Wrote off the account of Abigail McKee against the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The $683 balance in McKee’s account was from a credit sale last year. 18 Received Morris’s check in full payment for the June 4 purchase.

Factors like the unemployment rate,the stock market,global trade,economic policy,and the economic situation of other countries have no influence on the financial status of individuals. true or false

Corrective action must be taken for a project when (a) actual progress to the planned progress shows the progress is ahead of schedule. (b) the technical specifications have been met. (c) the actual cost of the activities is less than the funds received for the work completed. (d) the actual progress is less than the planned progress.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.