You are a rookie police officer who responds to a call for officer assistance. Arriving at the scene, you see a ring of officers surrounding a suspect who is down on his knees. You don't know what happened before you arrived, but you see a sergeant use a Taser on the suspect, and you see two or three officers step in and take turns hitting the suspect with their nightsticks about the head and shoulders. This goes on for several minutes and you stand in the back of the circle. No one says anything that would indicate that this is not appropriate behavior. What would you do? What would you do later when asked to testify that you observed the suspect make "threatening" gestures to the officers involved?

Mr. X is another cop who reacts to a call made by help official. At the point when he came. he saw that the ring of officials encompassed the suspect. Prior to the appearance of the Mr. X, he doesn't have the foggiest idea what occurred, however around then. he saw that the sergeant utilized the taser. which is a sort of weapon on the suspect. At that point consistently 2 to 3 officials were hitting the suspect by their tum for a few minutes. Nobody said whatever showed the improper demonstration.  

Figure out what Mr. X will do later on the off chance that he requested to affirm against the suspect: Mr. X ought to have halted ruthlessness that was conflicting with the suspect around then itself. Afterwards if Mr. X asked to affirming perception made by the officials told the speculate was giving the motions of compromising them. In any case, the officials needed to escape from the circumstance they lied that suspect was undermining.  

Mr. X ought not affirm that the speculate undermining as opposed to enlightening to the equity concerning the official's conduct towards the presume who severely they hit the suspect.

answer; at prices that violate government price regulations;