subject
Business, 14.04.2020 19:57 aprilreneeclaroxob0c

An engineer is studying the slight differences in the length of roofing shingles that is being produced at his roofing company. These differences fall within the specification of the product. This is an example of common-cause variation.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:10
Coca-cola was primarily known for its core competencies in marketing, bottling, and distributing aerated drinks. however, with the success of gatorade, coca-cola developed competencies in the development and marketing of its own sports drink, powerade. which of the following is true of coca-cola? a. it is leveraging existing core competencies to improve current market position. b. it is building new core competencies to protect and extend its current market position. c. it is redeploying and recombining existing core competencies to compete in markets of the future. d. it is targeting the chasm between the early adopter and early majority market segment.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:20
Afamily wishes to save for future college expenses. which financial tool should the family invest in?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:20
Who owns a renter-occupied apartment? a. the government b. a landlord c. the resident d. a cooperative
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
An engineer is studying the slight differences in the length of roofing shingles that is being produ...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.12.2021 22:20
Questions on the website: 13722362