The direct write-off method of accounting for bad debts uses an allowance account. uses a contra asset account. is the preferred method under generally accepted accounting principles. does not require estimates of bad debt losses.

Writing-off bad debts losses is one of the most preferred method in generally accepted accounting principles and is widely recognized.

It is the best method to hide the unnecessary assets of the firm and also hide the non-performing assets (NPA) of the firm.

Hence, the direct write-off of bad debts losses is a generally accepted practice under accounting principles.

To know more about accounting principles, click the link given below.

link

The correct answer is letter "D": does not require estimates of bad debt losses.

Explanation:

There are mainly two approaches while recognizing bad debts (unpaid debts):  the allowance method and the direct write-off method. Using the allowance method the unpaid account receivable goes through a series of stages until it is recognized as a bad debt. There are no set criteria to do so. When the firm eventually recognizes and calculates the amount of a bad expense, it is recorded in an allowance account. The negative balance diminishes the company's revenue.

The direct write-off method does not generate any allowance account. The account receivable is simply written-off after the company determines the debt as uncollectible. Thus, there is no need to estimate bad debt losses using this approach.

month 1 start amount =$3287.90 interest=(3287.90x0.0145/12)3.97 total to pay=$3291.81 paid =$1200 balance =$2,091.87

month 2 starting amount= $2,091.87 interest =$25.28 total to pay =$2117.15 paid =$1200 balance $917.15

month 3 starting amount =$917.15 interest =$11.08 total to pay =$928.23 paid =$928.23 balance =$0 total to pay 1200+1200+928.23 = $3328.23 it will take 3 months to pay a total of $3328.23

answer; ///decision making under risk;