Charles, Clarissa, and Francine all work in Manufacturing. The table shows the breakdown of one day for each employee.
Charles
Clarissa
Francine
9:00 a. m.-11:00 a. m.
6:00 a. m.-7:00 a. m.
8:00 a. m.-9:00 a. m.
meeting with production
team and first-line
supervisor of production
review lists of damaged
equipment
11:00 a. m.-12:00 p. m.
8:00 a. m.-11:00 a. m.
meeting with finance
team
decide on which products
need assessment
9:00 a. m.-12:00p. m.
test products on factory
floor against standards
1:00p. m. -4:00p. m.
write reports and
recommendations on
tested products
fix damaged machines in
the hospital laboratory
1:00 p. m.-2:00 p. m.
meeting with materials
engineer for new project
12:00 p. m.-2:00 p. m.

As part of a hiring process, codex marketing company conducts an internet search to discover what a job candidate has posted. to codex, this act should present

Which of the following is an example of formal management controls? answers: a firm's culturethe willingness of employees to monitor each otherbudgeting and reporting activitiesmanagerial motivation

John novosel was employed by nationwide insurance company for fifteen years. novosel had been a model employee and, at the time of discharge, was a district claims manager and a candidate for the position of division claims manager. during novosel's fifteenth year of employment, nationwide circulated a memorandum requesting the participation of all employees in an effort to lobby the pennsylvania state legislature for the passage of a certain bill before the body. novosel, who had privately indicated his disagreement with nationwide's political views, refused to lend his support to the lobby, and his employment with nationwide was terminated. novosel brought two separate claims against nationwide, arguing, first, that his discharge for refusing to lobby the state legislature on behalf of nationwide constituted the tort of wrongful discharge in that it was arbitrary, malicious, and contrary to public policy. novosel also contended that nationwide breached an implied contract guaranteeing continued employment so long as his job performance was satisfactory. what decision as to each claim?