In Clemens v. McNamee, major league pitcher Roger Clemens sued McNamee, a trainer, over McNamee's statements to investigators and Sports Illustrated that he gave steroids to Clemens in Toronto and New York. Clemens, a Texas citizen, filed a defamation suit in Texas against McNamee, a citizen of New York, based on diversity of citizenship. The court decided

The court decided in favor of the McNamee because he did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction, since Texas was not the focal point of the story.  

Explanation:

The court gave his final decision in favor of McNamee. Clement has not received decision in favor of his though he suffered from distress and damage of his reputation in Texas. McNamee illustrated that he gave steroids to Clements who was an Texas citizen

Mc Namee was a citizen of New York. He did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. McNamee was a trainer. According to the national magazine there was no such detail of defamation was provided.

so they can see what that city is producing and to also see if they can some how get that product. like gold in africa.

was my answer wrong?