subject
Business, 13.03.2020 04:02 brilove47

Consider two agents, Amanda and Billy Bob, agents A and B who are having dinner together at a restaurant. We will formulate their respective consumption choices via our standard consumption bundle choice framework. Specifically, they are each choosing two-dimensional consumption bundles x = (x1, x2) where good 1 is food at the restaurant and good 2 is a choice of "other stuff", a composite bundle representation of other consumption choices in the economy. Assume preferences are the same across the two diners, u(x) = 21.02. Furthermore, assume they have an equal income of m= 150. Finally, assume that prices are P1 = 1 and P2 = 1.
1. Separate bills:
Suppose each diner simply pays just for his/her own food. That is, the budget constraint is x_1 + x_2 = 150 for each of them. Solve for the optimal choice of consumption bundle x* = (x_1*,x_2*) for each diner. Use the usual conditions for an optimal interior choice, that is MRS(x*) = P1/P2 and the budget line.
2. Share the bill:
Now, suppose Amanda and Billy Bob agree to share the restaurant bill. That is each of them will have a restaurant food expenditure of (x_1A +x_1B)/2, where x_1A is Amanda's food choice and x_1B is Billy Bob's food choice. In this case, their respective budget lines are,

(1/2) x_1A + x_2A = 150 - (1/2) x_1B
(1/2) x_1B + x_2B = 150 - (1/2) x_1A.

That is, for a given Billy Bob food choice, Amanda's budget line is one where prices are now P1 = 1/2 and P2 = 1, and Amanda's income is m_A = 150 - 10/2. Similarly, for a given Amanda food choice, Billy Bob's budget line is one where prices are p1 = 1/2 and P2 = 1, and Billy Bob's income is m_B = 150 - x_1A/2.

(a) Solve for Amanda's optimal consumption bundle x^_A = (x^_1A, x^_2A) understanding that these expressions will depend on Billy Bob's food choice, x_1B. To solve for x_A*, use the standard conditions for an optimal interior consumption bundle choice MRS(x^_A) = P1/P2 = 1/2, and Amanda's budget line. I chose to use the "^" notation for the optimal consumption bundle choice because I am anticipating that we have yet to resolve the Nash equilibrium which I will eventually refer to with "*" notation.
(b) Solve for Billy Bob's optimal consumption bundle x^_B = (x^_1B, x^_2B) understanding that these expressions will depend on Amanda's food choice, x_1A.
(c) Verify that the above solutions for x^_1A(x_1B) and x^_1B(x_1A) correspond to the best food response equations for diners A and B in the slides (where I have now made explicit that the optimal food consumption choices depend on the other diner's food choice).
(d) Denote by (x*_A, x*_B) the Nash equilibrium food bundle choices for Amanda and Billy Bob.
i. State the two equations involving the best food response functions that characterize the Nash equilibrium, (x*_A, x*_B). These equations only involve the food parts of the consumption bundles, but the x_2 parts directly follow once you know the Nash equilibrium food choices.
ii. Solve for the Nash equilibrium, and state the bundles (x*_A, x*_B).

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:50
The maximum amount of money that a consumer can charge on a credit card is called the
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:40
The following pertains to smoke, inc.’s investment in debt securities: on december 31, year 3, smoke reclassified a security acquired during the year for $70,000. it had a $50,000 fair value when it was reclassified from trading to available-for-sale. an available-for-sale security costing $75,000, written down to $30,000 in year 2 because of an other-than-temporary impairment of fair value, had a $60,000 fair value on december 31, year 3. what is the net effect of the above items on smoke’s net income for the year ended december 31, year 3?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:40
Which term describes an alternative to car buying where monthly payments are paid for a specific period of time, after which the vehicle is returned to the dealership or bought? a. car financing b. car maintenance c. car leasing d. car ownership
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 02:40
The law firm of furlan and benson accumulates costs associated with individual cases, using a job order cost system. the following transactions occurred during july: jul. 3 charged 175 hours of professional (lawyer) time to the obsidian co. breech of contract suit to prepare for the trial, at a rate of $150 per hour. 10 reimbursed travel costs to employees for depositions related to the obsidian case, $12,500. 14 charged 260 hours of professional time for the obsidian trial at a rate of $185 per hour. 18 received invoice from consultants wadsley and harden for $30,000 for expert testimony related to the obsidian trial. 27 applied office overhead at a rate of $62 per professional hour charged to the obsidian case. 31 paid administrative and support salaries of $28,500 for the month. 31 used office supplies for the month, $4,000. 31 paid professional salaries of $74,350 for the month. 31 billed obsidian $172,500 for successful defense of the case. required: a. provide the journal entries for each of these transactions. refer to the chart of accounts for exact wording of account titles. b. how much office overhead is over- or underapplied? c. determine the gross profit on the obsidian case, assuming that over- or underapplied office overhead is closed monthly to cost of services.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Consider two agents, Amanda and Billy Bob, agents A and B who are having dinner together at a restau...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.12.2021 18:20
Questions on the website: 13722361