Business, 10.03.2020 20:24 billy12008

Suppose that jack and sophia and hal enter into an agreement for the sale of the business without the non-competition agreement. jack states that he would probably sign the non-competition agreement if they included an extra $100,000. a month later, hal and sophia bring jack $100,000. what is the result? a. jack cannot change his mind, since he stated that he would probably accept $100,000 additional for the non-competition agreement. b. if jack does not accept the $100,000, he may not sell the frozen food, but only for a reasonable amount of time. c. if jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause. d. if jack does not accept the $100,000, there is no valid contract for the sale of the business or for the non-competition agreement.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 10:00

Frolic corporation has budgeted sales and production over the next quarter as follows. the company has 4100 units of product on hand at july 1. 10% of the next months sales in units should be on hand at the end of each month. october sales are expected to be 72000 units. budgeted sales for september would be: july august september sales in units 41,500 53,500 ? production in units 45,700 53,800 58,150

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 12:30

Acorporation a. can use different depreciation methods for tax and financial reporting purposes b. must use the straight - line depreciation method for tax purposes and double declining depreciation method financial reporting purposes c. must use different depreciation method for tax purposes, but strictly mandated depreciation methods for financial reporting purposes d. can use straight- line depreciation method for tax purposes and macrs depreciation method financial reporting purposes

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:30

You should typically prepare at least questions for the people who will host you during a job shadow. a. 3 b. 4 c. 5 d. 2

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 22:00

In which of the following games is it clearly the case that the cooperative outcome of the game is good for the two players and bad for society? a. two oil companies own adjacent oil fields over a common pool of oil, and each company decides whether to drill one well or two wells.b. two airlines dominate air travel between city a and city b, and each airline decides whether to charge a "high" airfare or a "low" airfare on flights between those two cities.c. two superpowers decide whether to build new weapons or to disarm.d. in all of the above cases, the cooperative outcome of the game is good for the two players and bad for society

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose that jack and sophia and hal enter into an agreement for the sale of the business without th...

Questions