subject
Business, 09.03.2020 16:31 allytrujillo20oy0dib

You purchase a $30, nonrefundable ticket to a play at a local theater. Ten minutes into the show you realize that it is not a very good show and place only a $10 value on seeing the remainder of the show. Alternatively you could leave the theater and go home and watch TV or read a book. You place an $12 value on watching TV and a $8 value on reading a book. A. You should go home and watch TV. B. You should go home and read a book. C. You should stay and watch the remainder of the show. D. You should go home and either watch TV or read a book.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:30
Braden’s ice cream shop is losing business. he knows that customers are no longer choosing his product because a competing product has become less expensive, yet he has refused to lower his prices. what has happened to braden’s business?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 05:30
What is a potential negative effect of an expansionary policy? decreased borrowing increased interest rates increased inflation decreased available credit
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:20
Apractitioner is engaged to prepare a client's federal income tax return for 2017 and 2018. the practitioner files the 2017 return on the client's behalf and provided copies of the 2017 return and all related documents to the client. after the 2018 return is prepared, the client disputes the fees for the 2018 tax engagement, terminates the relationship, and requests all tax returns and related records. the client has not yet paid for preparation of the 2018 return. under irs circular 230, which records must the practitioner return to the client? a.) notes the practitioner took when meeting with the client about the 2017 and 2018 tax returns. b.) the engagement letter executed by the client for preparation of the 2018 federal income tax return. c.) an appraisal the practitioner prepared in connection with the 2017 federal income tax return. d.) schedules the practitioner prepared, which the client needs to file in its 2018 federal income tax return.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You purchase a $30, nonrefundable ticket to a play at a local theater. Ten minutes into the show you...
Questions
question
English, 18.07.2019 11:00
question
Biology, 18.07.2019 11:00
Questions on the website: 13722367