There are two countries trading. The one (A) devalues by 25%, while in both A and B their prices go up 25%. Talk on the issues of standard of living in the two countries, as well as competitiveness (standard of living is affected by both productivity and competitiveness.). Secondly, would your answers differ, if in the case of country A there is no devaluation, but a 25% productivity increase and a commensurate price decrease? (for B, its prices still rise by 25% in the second scenario).

Exchanging among two nations:  

Devaluation of productivity in two nations to the work will impact the business in the market. Directly it consequences for the benefit on the company. If we talk about the issues and the explanations behind downgrading between the nations, it will matters a great deal in the item trade and boundaries between the trading. If the work compensation increments on profitability, eventually work can deliver most extreme items which prompts colossal stockpile between the two nations.  

If there is no devaluation there is no downgrading, at last creation increments in amount and furthermore work hours will increment with viably, at that point certainly work will get the real wages without creation misfortune and it assists with delivering substantial creation.  

We can investigate the expectation for everyday comforts and the seriousness between the nations and produce the item as needs be  

If we follow the strategy follow the methodology of production will increment and there will be no devaluation further. Labour will get great wages when contrasted with previous. It encourages in great benefits to the organization.

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.

the law, public safety, corrections, and security cluster prepares people for careers in planning, managing, and providing legal, public safety, protective services and homeland security, including professional and technical support services.