Business, 25.02.2020 05:13 dani4685

Huprey Co. is the defendant in the following legal claims. For each of following claims, does Huprey (a) Record liability, (b) Disclose in notes, or (c) No disclosure. 1. It is reasonably possible that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. The loss cannot be estimable. Disclose in notes. No disclosure. Record liability. 2. Huprey is being used for damages of $2 million. It is very unlikely (remote) that Huprey will lose the case. Disclose in notes. No disclosure. Record liability. 3. Huprey can resonably estimate that a pending lawsuit will result in damages of $1.25 million, it is probable that Huprey will lose the case. Disclose in notes.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 21:30

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 00:20

Suppose an economy consists of three sectors: energy (e), manufacturing (m), and agriculture (a). sector e sells 70% of its output to m and 30% to a. sector m sells 30% of its output to e, 50% to a, and retains the rest. sector a sells 15% of its output to e, 30% to m, and retains the rest.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 02:50

Grey company holds an overdue note receivable of $800,000 plus recorded accrued interest of $64,000. the effective interest rate is 8%. as the result of a court-imposed settlement on december 31, year 3, grey agreed to the following restructuring arrangement: reduced the principal obligation to $600,000.forgave the $64,000 accrued interest.extended the maturity date to december 31, year 5.annual interest of $40,000 is to be paid to grey on december 31, year 4 and year 5. the present value of the interest and principal payments to be received by grey company discounted for two years at 8% is $585,734. grey does not elect the fair value option for reporting the debt modification. on december 31, year 3, grey would recognize a valuation allowance for impaired loans of

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:20

Lusk corporation produces and sells 14,300 units of product x each month. the selling price of product x is $25 per unit, and variable expenses are $19 per unit. a study has been made concerning whether product x should be discontinued. the study shows that $72,000 of the $102,000 in monthly fixed expenses charged to product x would not be avoidable even if the product was discontinued. if product x is discontinued, the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this product should be:

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Huprey Co. is the defendant in the following legal claims. For each of following claims, does Huprey...

Questions