Suppose that Kim K decides to spend $30,000 on an American made purse instead of donating it to Haitian earthquake relief. Assume that the multiplier is 1.9. How much will GDP rise when Kim K buys her purse according to the multiplier effect? Would buying the purse increase America's GDP by more, less, or the same as donating the money to Haitian earthquake relief? Suppose she instead donated to tornado relief in Joplin, MO. Would buying the purse increase GDP by more, less, or the same amount as spending on tornado relief?

answer; /// the use of a bank credit card to make purchase;

answer: in the short-run firms will respond by raising the price of turkey.

explanation: initially the long-run equilibrium is at a price of $5 per pound of turkey and a quantity of 50 million pounds per year. now, when webmd claims that a protein found in turkey will increase your expected lifespan by 4 years. the consumers demand for turkey will increase at every price shifting the demand curve to the right from d1 to d2. while, there will be no change in the supply curve in the short-run as it is not possible for producers to adjust supply so quickly. as a result the new equilibrium will occur at a higher price and a higher quantity of turkey.

thus, in the short run firms will respond by increasing the price of turkey, selling more quantity at a higher price and earning economic profits.

-the personal ownership of property

-the influence of consumer demand

explanation:

the command economy prohibits the personal ownership of property.

basically, command economy is defined as the system where a nation’s government is the one that makes all the decisions when it comes to its economy. the government is the one who controls the production of goods and services and regulates the prices and salaries.

therefore, since that the government is the authority, then all kinds of personal ownership of property is prohibited by them.