Many years after constructing a plant asset, management spent a significant sum on the asset. Which of the following types of expenditures should be capitalized in this instance:

(1) an expenditure for routine maintenance that increases the useful life compared with deferring the maintenance,

(2) an expenditure that increases the useful life of the asset compared with the original estimate assuming normal maintenance at the required intervals,

(3) an expenditure that increases the utility of the asset.

(1) (2) (3)
Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

1st one is no. Maintenance expenses do not add any value to the asset and the useful life does not change because of such improvements. Moreover, this has no impact on the depreciation too.

2nd one is yes. It should be capitalised as it directly increases the useful life time of the asset. This suggest that the improvement also changes the productivity of the asset and has an impact on the depreciation as well.

3rd one is Yes as well. When the "utility" of an asset is increased, this suggest that it's ability to generate future cash flows has also increased as well. Because of that, the expenditure must be capitalised and the useful life and the depreciation has to be adjusted accordingly as necessary.

Explanation:

i tried to get the answer but i could not find it

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.