Business, 14.02.2020 05:28 tiffanibell71

Suppose sellers of perfume are required to send $1.00 to the government for every bottle of perfume they sell. Further, suppose this tax causes the price paid by buyers of perfume to rise by $0.60 per bottle. Which of the following statements is correct?

a.

The effective price received by sellers is $0.40 per bottle less than it was before the tax.

b.

Sixty percent of the burden of the tax falls on sellers.

c.

This tax causes the demand curve for perfume to shift downward by $1.00 at each quantity of perfume.

d.

All of the above are correct.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 12:50

Jallouk corporation has two different bonds currently outstanding. bond m has a face value of $50,000 and matures in 20 years. the bond makes no payments for the first six years, then pays $2,100 every six months over the subsequent eight years, and finally pays $2,400 every six months over the last six years. bond n also has a face value of $50,000 and a maturity of 20 years; it makes no coupon payments over the life of the bond. the required return on both these bonds is 10 percent compounded semiannually. what is the current price of bond m and bond n?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00

During the month of march 2017, weimar world, a tax-preparation service, had the following transactions. * billed $496,000 in revenues on credit * received $164,000 from customers' accounts receivable * incurred expenses of $194,000 but only paid $87,700 cash for these expenses * prepaid $32,220 for computer services to be used next month what was the company's accrual basis net income for the month? select one: a. $302,000 b. $264,080 c. $ 41,860 d. $408,300 e. none of the above

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 19:00

Areview of the ledger of sheridan company at december 31, 2017, produces these data pertaining to the preparation of annual adjusting entries. 1. prepaid insurance $19,661. the company has separate insurance policies on its buildings and its motor vehicles. policy b4564 on the building was purchased on july 1, 2016, for $13,290. the policy has a term of 3 years. policy a2958 on the vehicles was purchased on january 1, 2017, for $8,586. this policy has a term of 18 months. 2. unearned rent revenue $468,720. the company began subleasing office space in its new building on november 1. at december 31, the company had the following rental contracts that are paid in full for the entire term of the lease. term (in months) number of leases date monthly rent nov. 1 8 $5,450 6 dec. 1 6 $8,630 4 3. notes payable $43,200. this balance consists of a note for 6 months at an annual interest rate of 7%, dated october 1. 4. salaries and wages payable $0. there are 9 salaried employees. salaries are paid every friday for the current week. 6 employees receive a salary of $620 each per week, and 3 employees earn $755 each per week. assume december 31 is a wednesday. employees do not work weekends. all employees worked the last 3 days of december. prepare the adjusting entries at december 31,2017.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose sellers of perfume are required to send $1.00 to the government for every bottle of perfume...

Questions