subject
Business, 13.02.2020 21:57 anna2894

On its 2008 balance sheet, Sherman Books showed a balance of retained earnings equal to $510 million. On its 2009 balance sheet, the balance of retained earnings was also equal to $510 million. Which of the following statements is most correct?

a. The company must have had net income equal to zero in 2009.
b. The company did not pay a dividend in 2009.
c. If the company's net income in 2009 was $200 million, dividends paid must have also equaled $200 million.
d. If the company lost money in 2009, they must have paid a dividend.
e. None of the statements above is correct.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Jordan, inc. sells fireworks. the company’s marketing director developed the following cost of goods sold budget for april, may, june, and july. april may june july budgeted cost of goods sold $62,000 $72,000 $82,000 $88,000 jordan had a beginning inventory balance of $3,000 on april 1 and a beginning balance in accounts payable of $14,600. the company desires to maintain an ending inventory balance equal to 15 percent of the next period’s cost of goods sold. jordan makes all purchases on account. the company pays 65 percent of accounts payable in the month of purchase and the remaining 35 percent in the month following purchase. required prepare an inventory purchases budget for april, may, and june. determine the amount of ending inventory jordan will report on the end-of-quarter pro forma balance sheet. prepare a schedule of cash payments for inventory for april, may, and june. determine the balance in accounts payable jordan will report on the end-of-quarter pro forma balance sheet.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
Which feature is a characteristic of a corporation?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 04:00
The servers at gerry frasier's busy ice cream shop decided that putting more ice cream in the sundaes and cones would bring back more customers. after three months, gerry was surprised to discover that his profit had
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
On its 2008 balance sheet, Sherman Books showed a balance of retained earnings equal to $510 million...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 28.04.2021 19:40
Questions on the website: 13722367