Comic book fans eagerly compete to buy copies of amazing fantasy no. 15, which contains the first appearance of the superhero spider-man. at the same time the publisher printed copies of the comic for the u. s. market, with the price printed on the cover in cents, it printed ccpies for the u. k. market, with the price printed on the cover in british pence. about 10 times as many u. s. copies of armazing fantasy no. 15 have survived as u. k. copies. yet in auctions that occurred at about the same time in 2013, a u. s. copy sold for $29,000, while a u. k. copy in the same condition sold for only s10,755 source: auction price date from: gpa analyss for cgc comics,

the market supply curve for amazing fantasy no. 15 in the u. s. is to the of the supply curve in the
the market demand curve for amazing fantasy no. 15 in the u. s. is to the the demand curve in the .

in both countries, the market equilibrium is where right

a. demand is greater than supply.
b. demand is zero eft
c. the demand curve intersects the supply curve.
d. there is a surplus.

Which statement below best describes george waring's approach to solving the problems of water-borne illness? a. waring is going with his "gut," because he believes that instincts and emotions are the best guides for action. b. waring efficiently and thoroughly lays out the case for why the problems are too large and overwhelming to be solved: people should just move out of cities back to their farms. c. waring has gathered the testimonies of people who live in densely populated areas in order to learn how they themselves have solved their problems. d. waring exhibits the industrial age's increased respect for and reliance on science and the scientific method.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

If you would like to ask a question you will have to spend some points