Read the case below and answer the questions that follow.

margoliâs is a hypothetical manufacturing company located in wayne county, michigan. all of its employees are residents of michigan, and most of its customers are also located in the state. one day, the primary deliveryman called in sick. carlos, one of the managers, had to fill in to make a delivery in bowling green, located in wood county, ohio. worried about being away from the plant for too long, carlos exceeded the speed limit as he drove toward bowling green. as he drove through lucas county, ohio, he was unable to control his truck as he made a sharp turn. he drove up onto the sidewalk and hit a pedestrian who was standing at the intersection waiting to cross the street. as a result, carlene, the pedestrian, suffered injuries that resulted in her becoming a paraplegic, ending her career as tennis pro. carlene is suing both margoliâs and carlos.

in the case of the reckless deliveryman, margoliâs and all of its employees are located in michigan. when the manager, carlos, was making a delivery, he exceeded the speed limit and struck carlene. carlene is now a paraplegic and must abandon her career as a tennis pro. the accident took place in ohio. which of the following facts will cause the jurisdiction to shift from concurrent federal jurisdiction to state jurisdiction?

a. carlos resides in ohio and carlene sues the wisconsin company that made carlosâs truck.
b. carlene had seen carlos coming but chose not to move out of the way.
c. carlos was a resident of ohio, not michigan
d. carlos was not violating the speed limit at the time he hit carlene.
e. carlene also sued the manufacturer of the delivery truck, a company located in wisconsin.