Business, 18.01.2020 06:31 oryunnis

As a junior congress person you have been asked to promote a bill to allow casino gambling in your state. there is much opposition to this bill. using distributive bargaining, discuss the pros and cons which might arise toward the passing or defeating of this bill.

read the discussion question carefully. the question is not fully about the merits or negatives of casino gambling.

how would you use distributive bargaining to defeat or pass the bill? either side is ok. there is no right or wrong answer. it's your opinion - just support it with resources.

example: casino gambling may bring in crime and drugs but it also can bring in money and jobs.

to satisfy concerns over crime and drugs - perhaps the bill can be negotiated to include funds for additional police and security and for additional social workers and programs to deal with potential drug or gambling addiction.

in distributive bargaining there are usually winners and losers. but a good deal maker can use leverage to ensure those on the other side get something positive for it that satisfies their concerns. if you supported casino gambling bill and you needed a vote from someone who did not support it you could offer up creative solutions to win the person over to your side.

just food for thought. i look forward to your creative solutions. don't just debate the pros and cons. your analysis needs to go further into negotiating using distributive bargaining.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: chhimmidemg

Explanation:

I would promote the establishment of the Casino Gambling Bar in my state and plan my arguments for discussion on the following items:

Casino deserves to play in the State:

More collection of revenue in the form of tax for the administration.

Tourist inflows on weekends, which lead to additional state revenues.

Boost in other businesses, such as casinos, pubs, car parks, gas sales, beer sales and expanded road tax collection.

Improved prospects for jobs.

The increased income selection will create a tourist attraction for the state residents, such as the ocean or a lake.

The demerits I can list and probably face during the argument are:

Concerns of law and order: Night operations are improved and provisions for the Casino Licensing are complied with.

It can increase drug trafficking. Education shall be taken by the police and other law enforcement agencies.

Drug addicts can harm the state: police take care. drug addicts.

Nightlife can be achieved for neighboring residents. Credit shall be taken on night patrols.

Can increase the number of road accidents caused by drunk driving.

Case that Casino Gambling is not new to America. Any real and concrete ties to ill effects such as opined use, drug trafficking and other ill effects are only attributed to a gaming casino.

If all the negative effects expected or perceived by the law enforcement agency are tracked, all the negative effects may be entirely eradicated and savings can be gained from increased revenues by the state.

Discussions with all state machinery must be held before the property is transferred to the casino and the police office can also provide its guidance during this time.

Answer from: Quest

Yikes. that sucks dide

Answer from: Quest

the answer choices are:

provides online banking

provides automatic payment services

provides home loans by using saving accounts

accept tax return refunds

hopefully someone can answer the question now lol

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 03:30

Nellie lumpkin, who suffered from dementia, was admitted to the picayune convalescent center, a nursing home. because of her mental condition, her daughter, beverly mcdaniel, signed the admissions agreement. it included a clause requiring the par- ties to submit any dispute to arbitration. after lumpkin left the center two years later, she filed a suit against picayune to recover damages for mistreatment and malpractice. [covenant health & rehabilitation of picayune, lp v. lumpkin, 23 so.2d 1092 (miss. app. 2009)] (see page 91.) 1. is it ethical for this dispute—involving negligent medical care, not a breach of a commercial contract—to be forced into arbitration? why or why not? discuss whether medical facilities should be able to impose arbitration when there is generally no bargaining over such terms.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 06:30

If the findings and the results are not presented properly, the research completed was a waste of time and money. true false

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 08:30

Sonic corp. manufactures ski and snowboarding equipment. it has estimated that this year there will be substantial growth in its sales during the winter months. it approaches the bank for credit. what is the purpose of such credit known as? a. expansion b. inventory building c. debt management d. emergency maintenance

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:40

A.j. was a newly hired attorney for idle time gaming, inc. even though he reported directly to the president of the company, a.j. noticed that the president always had time to converse with the director of sales, calling on him to get a pulse on legal/regulatory issues that, as the company attorney, a.j. could have probably handled. a.j. also noted that the hr manager’s administrative assistant was the go-to person for a number of things that would make life easier at work. a.j. was recognizing the culture at idle time gaming.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

As a junior congress person you have been asked to promote a bill to allow casino gambling in your...

Questions