Assume that, on january 1, 2018, matsui co. paid $809,600 for its investment in 35,200 shares of yankee inc. further, assume that yankee has 160,000 total shares of stock issued. the book value and fair value of yankee's identifiable net assets were both $320,000 at january 1, 2018. the following information pertains to yankee during 2018: net income $ 160,000 dividends declared and paid $ 48,000 market price of common stock on 12/31/2018 $ 25 /share 1. what amount would matsui report in its year-end 2018 balance sheet for its investment in yankee?

Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e.g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.