Presidential profits. linda was president of a publicly traded tractor company, tough tractors. linda became aware that stock in her company would likely increase significantly in value because her company had a contract to purchase the assets of rough tractors. the boards of both companies wanted the information kept confidential until the purchase was complete and a news release was made. before the news was made public, linda immediately purchased a significant number brother, george. frank and george purchased a number of shares of stock in tough tractors prior to any public announcement of the sale. after the public announcement was made and the purchase of assets went f shares in tough tractors. linda also told her friend frank about the contract to purchase assets. frank, who knew that the information was not public, told his through, linda, george and frank, all sold their shares in tough tractors and made a significant profit. which of the following would describe linda in providing information about the asset sale to frank? multiple choice tipper third-party beneficiary informant leaker enabler

What is the relationship between the national response framework and the national incident management system (nims)? a. the national response framework replaces the nims, which is now obsolete. b. the response protocols and structures described in the national response framework align with the nims, and all nims components support response. c. the nims relates to local, state, and territorial operations, whereas the nrf relates strictly to federal operations. d. the nims and the national response framework cover different aspects of incident management—the nims is focused on tactical planning, and the national response framework is focused on coordination.

Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e.g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.

Tom has brought $150,000 from his pension to a new job where his employer will match 401(k) contributions dollar for dollar. each year he contributes $3,000. after seven years, how much money would tom have in his 401(k)?