This problem has been solved!
see the answer
for this assignment, you will learn to identify fallacious statements, apply reasoning to support a decision or argument, and provide solutions to business scenarios.

prepare a 7- to 10-slide microsoft® powerpoint® presentation.

select one of the two scenarios below and weigh the pros of cons of the statements presente

your company wants to hire a third-party vendor to handle all of the customer service calls because they are a well-known leader in the industry with many clients. you are the manager of the customer service department for your company and have consistently reduced expenses over the past three years. what argument should you present to your employer to not hire a third-party vendor to handle customer service calls?

include the following in your presentation

identify the fallacious statements in the selected learning team business scenario.

select five or more points of reasoning that support your decision or argument.

describe how your logical reasoning counteracts the fallacious statements.

summarize why your selected business decision would be more effective.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.