Suppose the fed is worried because real gdp is expanding too rapidly. due to this concern, the fomc will discuss the direction of monetary policy at its next meeting. in this circumstance, one action the fed could take would be to ▼ buy sell bonds. this would ▼ increase decrease the amount of reserves in the banking system, and the fed’s expectation is that banks would make ▼ more less loans. as a result, the money supply would ▼ increase decrease , and the interest rate would ▼ rise fall . as a result, investment would ▼ decrease increase . aggregate demand would shift ▼ left right , and real gdp would ▼ decrease increase until full employment is restored. this action is referred to as ▼ expansionary contractionary monetary policy. of the fed's policy tools, open market operations is a. the weakest and least frequently used tool. b. the weakest tool. c. the most important and most frequently used tool. d. the strongest and least frequently used tool.

Write two goals for yourself that will aid you in pursuing your post-secondary education or training. with this

Prior to its closing, income summary had total debits of $1,190,500 and total credits of $1,476,300. what purpose is served by the income summary account and what is the nature of the entries that resulted in the $1,190,500 and the $1,476,300? the income summary account is used to the accounts. the $1,190,500 represents the , and the $1,476,300 represents . the company had of $ .

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?