subject
Business, 23.11.2019 05:31 Anthony1442

Android products, inc., agreed to accept a $1,000, one-year, 10 percent note from c. mate. on its maturity date of december 16, mate honors the note by making a payment of $1,100. that payment consisted of the principal of $1,000 plus interest in the amount of $100 (computed as $1,000 × 10%).
prepare the necessary december 16 entry for android by selecting the account names from the drop-down menus and entering the dollar amounts in the debit or credit columns.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:10
Paid-in-capital in excess of par represents the amount of proceeds a. from the original sale of common stock b. in excess of the par value from the original sale of common stock c. at the current market value of the common stock d. at the curent book value of the common stock
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:30
You are in the market for a new refrigerator for your company’s lounge, and you have narrowed the search down to two models. the energy efficient model sells for $700 and will save you $45 at the end of each of the next five years in electricity costs. the standard model has features similar to the energy efficient model but provides no future saving in electricity costs. it is priced at only $500. assuming your opportunity cost of funds is 6 percent, which refrigerator should you purchase
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 14:30
In a partnership, loans taken out by the general partners are binding on the limited partners. aren't a liability of either the general or limited partners aren't binding on the limited partners. are null and void.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:30
Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i.e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i.e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Android products, inc., agreed to accept a $1,000, one-year, 10 percent note from c. mate. on its ma...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 18.10.2019 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722360