Cleaners & solvents, inc. (csi), engages in deceptive advertising when it markets its product dirt remover as able to kill germs over long periods of time. in an action against csi regarding dirt remover, the firm is ordered to stop its false advertising of dirt remover and other products. this is

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?