subject
Business, 15.11.2019 20:31 kelcey1972harris

John wenman, merchandising manager at goodmark’s stationery store, is setting the price for craft fountainpens. the pens cost him $5 each. the store’s usual markup is 50 percent over cost that suggests that johnshould set the price at $7.50. however, to make this price seem like an unusually good bargain, john begins byoffering the pen at $10. he realizes that he won’t be able to sell many pens at this inflated price, but he doesn'tcare. john holds the price at $10 for only a few days, and then cuts it to the usual level—$7.50—and advertises: "terrific bargain on craft pens. were $10, now only $7.50! "note: the test the ftc sets up for "former" price comparisons is, "if the former price is the actual, bona fide priceat which the article was offered to the public on a regular basis for a reasonably substantial period of time, it provides a legitimate basis for the advertising of a price comparison."

1. if consumers perceive craft pens to be a good value at $10, is it fair for goodmark’s to sell the pen at thatprice?
2. is john’s price setting approach ethical? is it legal? explain.
3. how would you have set and advertised the craft pen’s price? would you have used a cost-plus approach orsome other method? explain.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:20
Richardson hired j.c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j.c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
Your team has identified the risks on the project and determined their risk score. the team is in the midst of determining what strategies to put in place should the risks occur. after some discussion, the team members have determined that the risk of losing their network administrator is a risk they'll just deal with if and when it occurs. although they think it's a possibility and the impact would be significant, they've decided to simply deal with it after the fact. which of the following is true regarding this question? a. this is a positive response strategy.b. this is a negative response strategy.c. this is a response strategy for either positive or negative risk known as contingency planning.d. this is a response strategy for either positive or negative risks known as passive acceptance.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
There is just one person in our group, silvia, who seems to have radically different ideas about how to complete our project. she seems to purposely disagree with the majority opinions of the rest of us though yesterday she said something that made a lot of sense to us solve our production problem. i suggested to the entire group today that we hear silvia’s suggestions and asked silvia to share in-depth more of what she said yesterday. i am using which adaptive leader behavior?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 17:00
Flounder supply company, a newly formed corporation, incurred the following expenditures related to land, to buildings, and to machinery and equipment. abstract company’s fee for title search $1,066 architect’s fees 6,499 cash paid for land and dilapidated building thereon 178,350 removal of old building $41,000 less: salvage 11,275 29,725 interest on short-term loans during construction 15,170 excavation before construction for basement 38,950 machinery purchased (subject to 2% cash discount, which was not taken) 112,750 freight on machinery purchased 2,747 storage charges on machinery, necessitated by noncompletion of building when machinery was delivered 4,469 new building constructed (building construction took 6 months from date of purchase of land and old building) 994,250 assessment by city for drainage project 3,280 hauling charges for delivery of machinery from storage to new building 1,271 installation of machinery 4,100 trees, shrubs, and other landscaping after completion of building (permanent in nature) 11,070 instructions determine the amounts that should be debited to land, to buildings,and to machinery and equipment. assume the benefits of capitalizing interest during constructionexceed the cost of implementation. indicate how any costs notdebited to these accounts should be recorded.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
John wenman, merchandising manager at goodmark’s stationery store, is setting the price for craft fo...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 18.01.2020 12:31
question
Mathematics, 18.01.2020 12:31
question
Mathematics, 18.01.2020 12:31
Questions on the website: 13722363