Current design co. is considering two mutually exclusive, equally risky, and not repeatable projects, s and l. their cash flows are shown below. the ceo believes the irr is the best selection criterion, while the cfo advocates the npv. if the decision is made by choosing the project with the higher irr rather than the one with the higher npv, how much, if any, value will be forgone, i. e., what's the chosen npv versus the maximum possible npv? note that (1) "true value" is measured by npv, and (2) under some conditions the choice of irr vs. npv will have no effect on the value gained or lost. r: 7.50%year 0 1 2 3 4cfs −$1,100 $550 $600 $100 $100cfl −$2,700 $650 $725 $800 $1,400a. $138.10b. $149.21c. $160.31d. $171.42e. $182.52

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.