subject
Business, 04.11.2019 21:31 tbeck225

Wrecked furniture. ralph buys new furniture for his living room from good times furniture. it is agreed that the goods will be placed with a common carrier for delivery. the contract between ralph and good times is ambiguous regarding whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods only to the common carrier's hands or whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods to ralph's home. unfortunately, on the way to ralph's home, through no fault of the delivery driver, the delivery truck got wrecked and the furniture was significantly damaged. what type of contract is presumed based upon the fact that the contract was ambiguous regarding whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods only to the common carrier's hands or whether the seller had the duty to deliver the goods to ralph's home?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00
Colah company purchased $1.8 million of jackson, inc. 8% bonds at par on july 1, 2018, with interest paid semi-annually. when the bonds were acquired colah decided to elect the fair value option for accounting for its investment. at december 31, 2018, the jackson bonds had a fair value of $2.08 million. colah sold the jackson bonds on july 1, 2019 for $1,620,000. the purchase of the jackson bonds on july 1. interest revenue for the last half of 2018. any year-end 2018 adjusting entries. interest revenue for the first half of 2019. any entry or entries necessary upon sale of the jackson bonds on july 1, 2019. required: 1. prepare colah's journal entries for above transaction.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:30
Presented below is information for annie company for the month of march 2018. cost of goods sold $245,000 rent expense $ 36,000 freight-out 7,000 sales discounts 8,000 insurance expense 5,000 sales returns and allowances 11,000 salaries and wages expense 63,000 sales revenue 410,000 instructions prepare the income statement.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 13:50
Which one of the following statements is true? ddt does not prevent disease from passing from agricultural animals to humans. cost was a major factor in the united states government's decision to ban ddt. many african governments concluded that the potential long-term health effects of ddt were not as serious as the immediate problem of insect control. ddt cannot accumulate in the fat of animals. the ddt ban in the united states has made it very difficult to control agricultural insect pests.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00
Describe how to write a main idea expressed as a bottom-line statement
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Wrecked furniture. ralph buys new furniture for his living room from good times furniture. it is agr...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.11.2020 07:00
question
Chemistry, 02.11.2020 07:00
question
English, 02.11.2020 07:00
Questions on the website: 13722363