subject
Business, 24.10.2019 00:50 alannalizettep8trnj

Suppose all individuals have a utility function of u = √c, where c is the amount of consumption a person has in any given period. there are two types of people: those at high risk, with a 4% chance of accident, and those at low risk, with a 2% chance of accident. half of individuals are high risk, and half are low risk. the income of all individuals is $40,000 per year, and a catastrophic accident costs $30,000. calculate the actuarially fair full insurance premium for each type of person, assuming the insurance company can identify who is high risk and who is low risk.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 13:00
Terry, a self-employed laboratory consultant specializing in white mice, attended a convention in paris concerning the care and feeding of white mice. the convention was held in paris since most of the white mice specialists in the world are located in france. terry's expenses were $1,600 for airfare, $400 for food, and $400 for lodging. terry spent 5 days at the convention and 3 days visiting friends. how much can she deduct for the trip?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:40
The board of directors is the highest ranking body in a corporation, and the chairman of the board is the highest ranking individual. the ceo generally works under the board and its chairman, and the board generally has the authority to remove the ceo under certain conditions. the ceo, however, cannot remove the board, but he or she can endeavor to have the board voted out and a new board voted in should a conflict arise. it is possible for a person to simultaneously serve as ceo and chairman of the board, though many corporate control experts believe it is bad to vest both offices in the same person. true false
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:40
Which critical success factor improves with reduced cycle time, better quality standards, and improved efficiency when an is is implemented?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:30
Suppose you win a small lottery and have the choice of two ways to be paid: you can accept the money in a lump sum or in a series of payments over time. if you pick the lump sum, you get $2,950 today. if you pick payments over time, you get three payments: $1,000 today, $1,000 1 year from today, and $1,000 2 years from today. 1) at an interest rate of 6% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 2) at an interest rate of 9% per year, the winner would be better off accepting the (lump sum / payments over time), since it has the greater present value. 3) years after you win the lottery, a friend in another country calls to ask your advice. by wild coincidence, she has just won another lottery with the same payout schemes. she must make a quick decision about whether to collect her money under the lump sum or the payments over time. what is the best advice to give your friend? a) the lump sum is always better. b) the payments over time are always better. c) it will depend on the interest rate; advise her to get a calculator. d) none of these answers is good advice.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Suppose all individuals have a utility function of u = √c, where c is the amount of consumption a pe...
Questions
question
English, 19.01.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 19.01.2021 20:00
question
Arts, 19.01.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 19.01.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 19.01.2021 20:00
Questions on the website: 13722367