Suppose that an attack would do $300,000 in damage and has a 20% annual probability of success. spending $15,000 per year on countermeasure a would reduce the damage of a successful attack by 50%. a) do a risk analysis comparing benefits and costs. show your work clearly. explain whether or not the company should spend the money. b) do another risk analysis if countermeasure b costs $30,000 per year but would cut the annual probability of a successful attack by 40%. again, show your work. explain whether or not the company should spend the money.