subject
Business, 06.10.2019 05:30 kromaug1517

This problem has been solved!
see the answer
the expenditure and value-added approaches to calculating gdp arrive at the same final number, but they reach that number in different ways. to illustrate, consider the possible effects of the following set of transactions on gdp:
1. eric pays awesome foods market $1,000 to cater his daughter's engagement party. he's attracted by awesome foods market's guarantee that he'll be happy with the catering or get his money back.
2. awesome foods market pays joann's catering $900 to cater the party.
3. joann's catering buys plasticware worth $150 from kostko.
compute the contribution to gdp of this set of transactions, using the expenditure approach, i. e., by assuming expenditures of buyers of final goods and services. assume that kostko receives the plasticware at no charge and that other costs are zero.
which of the following would be included in the expenditure method of calculating gdp? check all that apply.
eric spends $1,000.
joann's catering spends $150.
awesome foods market spends $900.
the total contribution of these transactions to gdp, as measured by the expenditure approach, is .
now use the following table to compute the contribution of these transactions to gdp by summing the values added at each stage of production.
stage of production sale value cost of intermediate goods resource cost-income
kostko $150 — $
joann's catering $900 $ $
awesome foods market $1,000 $ $
the contribution to gdp that you found using the expenditure approach corresponds to the sum of the each

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 19:30
The framers of the us constitution created a system of government that established branches of government set forth the powers of such a branches and placed limits on those powers what are the benefits of such a system? are there any problems associated with such a system?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 23:00
Ajustification for job training programs is that they improve worker productivity. suppose that you are asked to evaluate whether more job training makes workers more productive. however, rather than having data on individual workers, you have access to data on manufacturing firms in ohio. in particu- lar, for each firm, you have information on hours of job training per worker (training) and number of nondefective items produced per worker hour (output). (i) carefully state the ceteris paribus thought experiment underlying this policy question. (ii) does it seem likely that a firm’s decision to train its workers will be independent of worker characteristics? what are some of those measurable and unmeasurable worker characteristics? (iii) name a factor other than worker characteristics that can affect worker productivity. (iv) if you find a positive correlation between output and training, would you have convincingly established that job training makes workers more productive? explain.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:30
Which of these is not a result of regular exercise
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 23:20
Warby parker, a manufacturer of fashionable prescription eyewear, notes on its website, "warby parker was founded with a rebellious spirit and a loft objective: to offer designer eyewear at a revolutionary price, while leading the way for socially-conscious business." this excerpt from the company's website states warby parker's
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
This problem has been solved!
see the answer
the expenditure and value-added approaches...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 01.07.2020 15:01
Questions on the website: 13722360