Acase comes before a wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the internet. it is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the wisconsin courts. in deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider:
a. public policy related to internet issues. b. the judge's personal feelings about the internet. c. cases from other jurisdictions on similar internet issues. d. social values and customs as applied to internet issues.

The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.

Explanation:

When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.

answer; i believe its (d) intrinsic;

employers prefer to hire ingenious, resourceful people because ingenious people may be more liable to engage in unethical deportment as they can cerebrate outside of the box