subject
Business, 27.08.2019 23:20 samafeggins2

In the initial cournot duopoly equilibrium, both firms have constant marginal costs, m, and no fixed costs, and there is a barrier to entry. show what happens to thebest-response function of firms if both firms now face a fixed cost of f. let market demand bep=a-−bq, where a and b are positive parameters with 2 firms.  let q1 and q2 be the amount produced by firm 1 and firm 2, respectively. assuming it is optimal for the firm one to produce, its best-response function isq1=? ?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:30
Sweeten company had no jobs in progress at the beginning of march and no beginning inventories. the company has two manufacturing departments--molding and fabrication. it started, completed, and sold only two jobs during march—job p and job q. the following additional information is available for the company as a whole and for jobs p and q (all data and questions relate to the month of march): molding fabrication total estimated total machine-hours used 2,500 1,500 4,000 estimated total fixed manufacturing overhead $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 estimated variable manufacturing overhead per machine-hour $ 1.40 $ 2.20 job p job q direct materials $ 13,000 $ 8,000 direct labor cost $ 21,000 $ 7,500 actual machine-hours used: molding 1,700 800 fabrication 600 900 total 2,300 1,700 sweeten company had no underapplied or overapplied manufacturing overhead costs during the month. required: for questions 1-8, assume that sweeten company uses a plantwide predetermined overhead rate with machine-hours as the allocation base. for questions 9-15, assume that the company uses departmental predetermined overhead rates with machine-hours as the allocation base in both departments. 1. what was the company’s plantwide predetermined overhead rate? (round your answer to 2 decimal places.) next
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:10
Paddock pools constructed a swimming pool and deck for the jensens' home. paddock installed the wrong trim on the pool. it would cost $2800 to change the trim-one-fifth of the total cost of the pool. the jensens refuse to pay anything for the pool. the paddock's best defense is: (a) duress (b) substanial performance (c)mistake (d) failure of conditions
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:30
Uknow what i love about i ask a dumb question it is immediately answered but when i ask a real question it take like an hour to get answered
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In the initial cournot duopoly equilibrium, both firms have constant marginal costs, m, and no fixed...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.03.2021 17:00
question
Mathematics, 05.03.2021 17:00
Questions on the website: 13722367