Suppose that jack and hal and sophia enter into the agreement for the sale of the restaurant, with jack stating in the agreement that if he feels comfortable with his finances in his retirement, that he will not sell the frozen food in competition with the restaurant. after the sale, the stock market rises considerably, and jack’s net worth quadruples. he still decides to sell the frozen food. hal and sophia sue. what is the result? a. hal and sophia would win since the contract mentioned the non-competition agreement. b. jack would unless that hal and sophia could prove that jack was comfortable with his finances in his retirement. c. hal and sophia would win since jack’s net worth quadrupled. d. jack would win since the promise not to compete was illusory.

Alandlord rented an art studio to an artist. under the terms of the signed, written, two-year lease, the artist agreed to pay the landlord $1,000 per month and to assume responsibility for all necessary repairs. after the first year of the lease, the artist assigned the balance of his lease to a sculptor. the landlord approved the sculptor as a tenant and accepted two rent payments from her, and then the landlord sold the building to an investor. the sculptor had made two payments to the investor when an electrical fire broke out in the studio, injuring the sculptor. the fire was caused by faulty wiring. the landlord was aware that there was a dangerous wiring problem when he leased the property to the artist. but when the landlord discovered how costly repairs would be, he decided it would be more profitable to sell the property than to repair it. the problem was not easily discoverable by anyone other than an expert electrician, and the landlord did not tell the artist, the sculptor, or the investor about the problem. the sculptor sues to recover damages for her injuries. from whom can the sculptor recover?