Scenario 1: aiden comes in from work. jane had cooked dinner and is waiting for him so they could eat. however, aiden is tired and just wants to go to bed. jane is furious and refuses to speak to him. in response, he merely goes to their room and sleeps. scenario 2: aiden comes in from work. jane cooked dinner and is waiting for him so they could eat. however, aiden is tired and just wants to go to bed. jane is furious and tells him how she feels whenever he does this to her. aiden empathizes with jane’s feelings and offers a compromise; the next time he would be in late for dinner, he promises to call ahead of time. in the supportive scenario, what do aiden and jane do in order to alleviate the conflict? a. they asked open ended questions. b. they strove to promote equality. c. list all problems and annoyances. d. they empathized with each other. select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d

Compute the cost of not taking the following cash discounts. (use a 360-day year. do not round intermediate calculations. input your final answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

Is will able to claim r.j. as a qualifying child for the earned income credit (eic)?