Biology, 19.08.2019 16:30 gujaratif932
Ascientist performed an experiment to test her hypothesis that a disease in horses was caused by a deficiency in an important mineral. the results did not support her hypothesis. however, some of her data showed an important change in one hormone. the scientist knew that the hormone was related to a different mineral, so she formed a new hypothesis. what is the most logical step for the scientist to take next?
a) design an experiment to test the new hypothesis.
b) pose a new question to be answered.
c) replace the old hypothesis with the new hypothesis.
d) draw new conclusions to fit the new hypothesis.
explane so i can understand why the answer is the answer!
Answers: 2
Biology, 22.06.2019 07:30
Ture or false evidence for evolution includes millions of fossils
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 11:30
Which of the following statements is true about the relationship between genetic variation and natural selection? a. genetic variation must be present in a population before natural selection can act on it. b. genetic variation arises in a population as a result of natural selection. c. natural selection can act on a population whether there is genetic variation within the population or not. d. after natural selection acts on a population, the amount of genetic variation in the population always increases.
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 11:40
Which of the following happened during the precambrian era? the first prokaryotic cells the first eukaryotic cells development of photosynthesis all of the above
Answers: 1
Ascientist performed an experiment to test her hypothesis that a disease in horses was caused by a d...
Biology, 21.05.2020 05:04
English, 21.05.2020 05:04
Mathematics, 21.05.2020 05:04
Mathematics, 21.05.2020 05:04
English, 21.05.2020 05:04
Mathematics, 21.05.2020 05:04
Mathematics, 21.05.2020 05:04