Think of some studies you've heard about. How can you tell whether the studies were well-designed and scientifically accurate or has biases?

Researchers determine that the biodiversity in a woodland region is declining. they identify two major threats to the region's biodiversity, a method to address each threat, and the expected outcome of each method. this information is shown in the table. threat method number of species that benefit number of years to see benefit habitat fragmentation reforestation 450 8 introduced prey species biological augmentation 150 2 which statement is an accurate explanation of the information in the table? a. biological augmentation would benefit only a few species because it is typically not very effective. b. biological augmentation would take less time to be effective because it targets the majority of prey species. c. reforestation would take the longest time to be effective because trees take several years to grow. d. reforestation would not benefit many species because most forest species live on the ground.

Graphs you see question 5 options: the change in data over time the relationship between different dependent variables the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable/s the relationship between different independent variables

Which statement is a physical property? becomes moldy quicklyeasy to digestconducts electricity poorlydoes not burn