You successfully clone an organism and are excited to publish your feat in Nature. However, a skeptical reviewer is not convinced because your donor cell could have been a stem cell, therefore undifferentiated and more amenable to somatic cell nuclear transfer. Furthermore, given the inefficiency of the process, the reviewer questions whether you may have produced a parthenote, not a clone. What data do you show the reviewer to convince them that your donor cell was fully specialized and that its genes directed the development of the new organism

Which table best shows the impacts resulting from human activity? impact of human activities human activity impact forest area cleared to construct an airport increase in oxygen level vegetation cleared to construct an oil mine increase in pollution impact of human activities human activity impact forest area cleared to construct an airport increase in sound pollution vegetation cleared to construct a power plant contamination of water impact of human activities human activity impact beehives cleared from urban areas increase in vegetation dams constructed on a river increase in fish population impact of human activities human activity impact beehives cleared from urban areas increase in bird population dams constructed on a river better quality of water

Could someone me with number one you

Which statement correctly describes a way that mutations increase the likelihood that a species will survive in a changing environment