I would consider the practice of "ghost hunting” to be closer to pseudoscience than science because the work described in the article mostly lacks process and is subjective. In the article, people looking for evidence of ghosts do not set up controlled experiments with repeated trials. Instead, they take several measurements and make guesses about what might be causing the results they see. The people in the article also base conclusions on observations such as feeling a "heavy presence” or a "sudden chill.” These are subjective observations.

Graphs you see question 5 options: the change in data over time the relationship between different dependent variables the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable/s the relationship between different independent variables

Which of the following produces carbon dioxide? a. plants b. animals c. decomposers d. all of the above

Aresearcher designed an investigation to test what effect eating different types of food would have on blood insulin levels. she selected 10 male subjects who were all 25 years of age and in good health. the experiment took place over 3 days. at 8: 00 a.m. on each day, the subjects ate a meal consisting of only 1 type of food. they had their blood insulin levels measured after consuming the meal. on day 1 they ate a high fat diet, on day 2 they ate a high protein diet, and on day 3 they ate a high sugar diel what is the independent variable in this experiment? a the age of the subjects b the blood insulin level c the type of food consumed d the time of day the meal was consumed