A judge decides to hold a hearing to consider arguments for and against the admissibility of a piece of scientific evidence. which precedent is he following? miranda v. arizona

frye v. united states

daubert v. merrell dow pharmaceuticals

roe v. wade

Frye v. United States

Explanation:

To meet the Frye standard, scientific evidence presented to the court must be interpreted by the court as "generally accepted" by a meaningful segment of the associated scientific community. This applies to procedures, principles or techniques that may be presented in the proceedings of a court case.

In practical application of this standard, those who were proponents of a widely disputed scientific issue had to provide a number of experts to speak to the validity of the science behind the issue in question.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals was the Supreme Court case that overturned Frye.

gfgfgfgfgfgf

explanation:

i think that d. wind is the answer.   i missed the question when i answered a. currents.