Which of these statements applies to a scientific hypothesis but not to a scientific theory?

They are widely accepted explanations of natural phenomenon that have been extensively tested.

They are absolute proofs of a scientific explanation obtained after rigorous testing.

They are open to further study and can be revised pending new evidence.

Explanation:

Scientific theories are widely accepted explanations of natural phenomenon that have been extensively tested.

Generally, a scientific law describes an observed phenomenon, but a scientific theory explains it.

Scientific theories DON'T become laws no matter the research.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest