Biology, 30.08.2021 21:30 pokenerdz

What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? A. There would be no difference since decomposition is an abiotic factor and cycling of nutrients would still occur.
B. The energy and nutrients required for life would be stuck and could not be cycled, thus life would cease.
C. There is no need for bacteria since they do not play any role in biogeochemical cycles, just plants and animals..
D. No one would know.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Biology

Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00

Which units ate used to measure both velocity and speed? check all that apply

Answers: 1

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 04:00

Select the true statements about eubacteria. most live as decomposers and heterotrophs. most only thrive in a narrow range of environments. certain eubacteria are responsible for food poisoning. eubacteria thrive in extreme environments.

Answers: 3

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 05:00

Dna. we have heard that we are a product of our dna. but where is it? how do we "get" our dna? it is passed to us, from our parents, but in what form? several vocabulary words associated with inheritance are used interchangeably and sometimes, incorrectly. let's see if you can clear this up for someone just learning about inheritance and cell structure.

Answers: 2

Answer

Biology, 22.06.2019 07:30

Answer ! in your opinion, what are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our ecosystem? respond to this question in claim, evidence, reasoning format. 1. make your claim (i are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our 2. follow the claim with 3 pieces of evidence. evidence may be taken from the reading, the videos, previous lessons, or googled answers. site sources, too. 3. use reasoning to explain why you chose your evidence.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

What would happen to life if there were no bacteria involved in biogeochemical cycles? A. There wo...

Questions