I’ll make brainliest!! Read the paragraph from "Stick to Real Microscopes."
What is the author's purpose in the paragraph?
to argue that it is easier to take video with a
real microscope than a smartphone
microscope
The piece I read also insisted that smartphone
microscopes are better because they let users take
video of what they observe. That is certainly good and
useful. Being able to take video is valuable. And I do
not intend to argue against that value. Rather, I will just
say that one does not need a smartphone
microscope to take video. I found several real
microscopes that come with digital cameras and
video recorders. They can record videos just as easily
as a smartphone microscope, but they can do'so at
much higher magnification. Several cost around $300
(Gates). Again, the real microscope is the better
scientific tool
to suggest that video capability is the most
important feature for microscope users
to compare the cost of microscopes with
and without video and camera features
to explain that real microscopes have video
o capability superior smartphone
microscopes