The conclusion of a study should always be that the hypothesis is correct? true or false

The correct answer will be option-False.

Explanation:

A scientific investigation is performed to answer and explain the natural phenomenon by following scientific method.

In the scientific method, a proposed hypothesis is proposed in such a way that it can explain the question to a limited extent as well as can be tested through experiments. The experiments provide the results on the basis of which conclusions are made.

It is not necessary that hypothesis will be always true as it is considered an educated guess based on the previous work.  The experiment is performed to test the hypothesis and not to verify the hypothesis that it is true.

Thus, option-false is the correct answer.

humans are now responsible for causing changes in the environment that hurt animals and plant species. we take up more space on earth for our homes and cities. we pollute habitats. human activity often changes or destroys the habitats that plants and animals need to survive.

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest