Astudent wants to make an analogy to her remember the characteristics of the planets. which analogy makes the most sense?

the inner planets are like cotton candy and the outer planets are like hard butterscotch candy.

the outer planets are like bowling balls and the inner planets are like basketballs.

the inner planets are like hard butterscotch candy and the outer planets are like cotton candy.

the outer planets are like roses and the inner planets are like daisies.

The inner planets are like hard butterscotch candy and the outer planets are like cotton candy.

Explanation:

The solar system has 4 inner planets and 4 outer planets. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) are small terrestrial planets -having rocky surface. The outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) are large Jovian planets composed of gases. The outer planets are characterized by the presence of ring system and many number of moons as compared to inner planets. Thus, the correct analogy would be that inner planets are like hard butterscotch candy and outer planets are like cotton candy.

doctors i believe if i'm wrong sorry

the answer is; comparing the frequency of collisions with and without the device

this makes the anti-collision system an independent variable and the collisions a dependent variable. if there are fewer collisions with an anti-collision system that without, then it can be stated that the system is a success. essentially, collisions under an anti-collision system are compared with the frequency of collisions by cars with the human drivers.