Astudent conducted an experiment to test whether talking to plants would them to grow faster. the student talked to one group of plants and hand watered them. the student did not talk to the other group of plants and used sprinklers. after three weeks, the plants that were spoken to showed much more growth than the plants that were not. based on the results of this experiment, which is the best conclusion?
talking to plants may or may not plants grow faster because three weeks is not enough time to tell.
talking to plants may or may not plants grow faster because the amount of water given was likely different for each group.
talking to plants does not plants grow faster because the experiment did not involve enough groups of plants to determine this.
talking to plants does plants grow faster because those plants showed more growth.

Talking to plants may or may not help plants grow faster because the amount of water given was likely different for each group.

Explanation:

In the given situation, the growth of the plant is the dependent variable, which is affected by the talking and water which are the independent variables. The talking cannot be considered as the reliable variable for allowing the plant to grow but water is the basic necessity.

Not each group was given equal amounts of water thus talking to plants may or may not help in growth.

helicase, i think thats it

question: which statement best describes the different properties of metals?

answer: they are shiny and bend without breaking.

since metals have certain characteristics properties, they include the following: they are ductile, malleable, shiny, hard, lustrous, flexible and they are good conductor of heat and electricity. so therefore, metals are not dull and they are not non-flexible as listed. instead, they are shiny and flexible.

hope this , have a good day. c;