Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. what is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper?
a)they will change their research to a different topic and start all over again.
b)they will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting.
c)they will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper. d)they will sue the journal for not printing the paper and delaying their research.
Answers: 2
Biology, 21.06.2019 17:50
How did the research presented in the article affect scientists' understanding of the evolution of eukaryotes
Answers: 3
Biology, 21.06.2019 18:50
Ectocarpene is a volatile, sperm cell-attracting material released by the eggs of the seaweed ectocarpus siliculosus. its constitution is all the double bonds are cis, and the absolute configuration of the chirality center is s. draw a stereochemically accurate representation of ectocarpene.
Answers: 3
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which is not a likely outcome after extensive irrigation of dry farmland? useless, unproductive soil salinization of the soil depletion of groundwater nutrient-rich soil
Answers: 1
Biology, 22.06.2019 03:30
Based on the topographic map of mt. st. helens, what is the contour interval of the volcano about height is 2,950 m?
Answers: 2
Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientif...
Arts, 26.01.2021 18:50
Chemistry, 26.01.2021 18:50
Physics, 26.01.2021 18:50
Social Studies, 26.01.2021 18:50
Business, 26.01.2021 18:50
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 18:50
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 18:50
English, 26.01.2021 18:50
Mathematics, 26.01.2021 18:50